رکورد قبلیرکورد بعدی

" David's hammer : "


Document Type : BL
Record Number : 1015899
Doc. No : b770269
Main Entry : Bolick, Clint.
Title & Author : David's hammer : : the case for an activist judiciary /\ Clint Bolick.
Publication Statement : Washington, D.C. :: Cato Institute,, ©2007.
Page. NO : 1 online resource (206 pages)
ISBN : 1281905275
: : 1933995300
: : 9781281905277
: : 9781933995304
: 1933995025
: 1933995033
: 9781933995021
: 9781933995038
Bibliographies/Indexes : Includes bibliographical references (pages 165-177) and index.
Contents : Mrs. Swedenburg goes to court -- Judicial activism: everybody's favorite bogeyman -- The origins and importance of judicial review -- Judicial activism: the bad and the good -- The Rehnquist Court: a judicial counterrevolution fizzles out -- Model justice -- Economic liberty -- Private property rights -- School choice -- State constitutions: the beckoning frontier -- An activist judiciary, for all the right reasons.
Abstract : Judicial activism is condemned by both right and left, for good reason: lawless courts are a threat to republican government. But challenging conventional wisdom, constitutional litigator Clint Bolick argues in Davids Hammer that far worse is a judiciary that allows the other branches of government to run roughshod over precious liberties. That, Bolick demonstrates, is exactly the role the framers intended the courts to play, envisioning a judiciary deferential to proper democratic governance but bold in defense of freedom. But the historical record is painfully uneven. During the Warren era.
Subject : United States.
: United States.
Subject : Political questions and judicial power-- United States.
Subject : LAW-- Civil Procedure.
Subject : LAW-- Legal Services.
Subject : Political questions and judicial power.
Subject : POLITICAL SCIENCE-- Government-- Judicial Branch.
Subject : United States.
Dewey Classification : ‭347.73/1‬
LC Classification : ‭KF384.B58 2007‬
کپی لینک

پیشنهاد خرید
پیوستها
Search result is zero
نظرسنجی
نظرسنجی منابع دیجیتال

1 - آیا از کیفیت منابع دیجیتال راضی هستید؟