Document Type
|
:
|
BL
|
Record Number
|
:
|
1034434
|
Doc. No
|
:
|
b788804
|
Main Entry
|
:
|
Rodin, David.
|
Title & Author
|
:
|
War and self-defense /\ David Rodin.
|
Publication Statement
|
:
|
Oxford :: Clarendon Press ;New York :: Oxford University Press,, 2002.
|
Page. NO
|
:
|
xvi, 213 pages :: illustrations ;; 23 cm
|
ISBN
|
:
|
0199257744
|
|
:
|
: 0199275416
|
|
:
|
: 9780199257744
|
|
:
|
: 9780199275410
|
Bibliographies/Indexes
|
:
|
Includes bibliographical references (pages 200-207) and index.
|
Contents
|
:
|
Introduction: The argument -- The status of moral claims -- War and consequentialism -- Part I: Self-defense -- Rights -- Hohfeld's building blocks -- Logical structure of rights -- Having a right and being in the right -- Justification and excuse -- Model of defensive rights -- A three-legged stool -- Defense as a derivative right -- Limits on the right: necessity, imminence, proportionality -- Bounds of proportionality -- Consequences and forced choice -- The lesser evil -- Forced choice -- The resilience of responsibility -- Grounding self-defense in rights -- Forfeiture and rights of limited scope -- The role of fault -- Innocent threats and innocent aggressors -- Objective wrongdoing -- Moral subjects -- Variety of excuses -- Part II: National-defense -- International law -- National-defense in international law -- Limits of the right -- Need for a normative foundation -- War and defense of persons -- Two levels of war -- Reductive strategy -- Imminent and conditional threats -- War and the protection of persons -- War and the common life -- Political association -- The character of common lives -- Communal integrity and self-determination -- Myth of descrete communities -- War, responsibility, and law enforcement -- Paradox in the just war theory -- Responsibility of soldiers -- War and law enforcement -- Argument for a universal state -- Conclusion: Morality and realism.
|
Abstract
|
:
|
When is it right to go to war? The most persuasive answer to this question has been 'in self-defense'. In a new analysis, bringing together moral philosophy, political science, and law, David Rodin shows what's wrong with this answer. He proposes a comprehensive new theory of the right of self-defense which resolves many of the perplexing questions that have dogged both jurists and moral philosophers. By applying the theory of self-defense to international relations, Rodin produces a far-reaching critique of the canonical Just War theory. The simple analogy between self-defense and national defense - between the individual and the state - needs to be fundamentally rethought, and with it many of the basic elements of international law and the ethics of international relations--Publisher's description.
|
Subject
|
:
|
Self-defense (International law)
|
Subject
|
:
|
War (International law)
|
Subject
|
:
|
Guerre (Droit international)
|
Subject
|
:
|
Guerre (Philosophie)
|
Subject
|
:
|
Légitime défense (Droit international)
|
Subject
|
:
|
Légitime défense-- Aspect moral.
|
Subject
|
:
|
Ethik
|
Subject
|
:
|
Guerre (droit international)
|
Subject
|
:
|
Just war doctrine.
|
Subject
|
:
|
Légitime défense (droit international)
|
Subject
|
:
|
Nation
|
Subject
|
:
|
Selbstverteidigung
|
Subject
|
:
|
Selbstverteidigung
|
Subject
|
:
|
Self-defense (International law)
|
Subject
|
:
|
Self-defense (International law)
|
Subject
|
:
|
Self-defense.
|
Subject
|
:
|
Verteidigung
|
Subject
|
:
|
Völkerrecht
|
Subject
|
:
|
War (International law)
|
Subject
|
:
|
War (International law)
|
Subject
|
:
|
War-- Moral and ethical aspects.
|
Subject
|
:
|
War.
|
Subject
|
:
|
Krieg.
|
Subject
|
:
|
Bellum justum.
|
Subject
|
:
|
Oorlogsrecht.
|
Subject
|
:
|
Zelfverdediging.
|
Dewey Classification
|
:
|
341.6
|
|
:
|
172.42
|
LC Classification
|
:
|
KZ4043.R63 2002
|
NLM classification
|
:
|
86.92bcl
|
|
:
|
CC 7800rvk
|
|
:
|
CC 7800.rvk
|
|
:
|
KC1350 RODmoys
|
|
:
|
MK 3100rvk
|
|
:
|
MK 3100.rvk
|
|
:
|
PR 2622rvk
|
|
:
|
PR 2622.rvk
|