رکورد قبلیرکورد بعدی

" State-directed development : "


Document Type : BL
Record Number : 1035905
Doc. No : b790275
Main Entry : Kohli, Atul.
Title & Author : State-directed development : : political power and industrialization in the global periphery /\ Atul Kohli.
Publication Statement : Cambridge, UK ;New York :: Cambridge University Press,, 2004.
: , ©2004
Page. NO : 1 online resource (xii, 466 pages)
ISBN : 051122933X
: : 0511230176
: : 0511230931
: : 0511231709
: : 0511316836
: : 051175437X
: : 1139931164
: : 1280702206
: : 9780511229336
: : 9780511230172
: : 9780511230936
: : 9780511231704
: : 9780511316838
: : 9780511754371
: : 9781139931168
: : 9781280702204
: 0521545250
: 0521836700
: 9780521545259
: 9780521836708
Bibliographies/Indexes : Includes bibliographical references and index.
Contents : Introduction: states and industrialization in the global periphery -- Part I. Galloping ahead: Korea: The colonial origins of a modern political economy: the Japanese lineage of Korea's cohesive-capitalist state -- The Rhee interregnum: saving South Korea for cohesive capitalism -- A cohesive-capitalist state reimposed: Park Chung Hee and rapid industrialization. Part II. Two steps forward, one step back: Brazil -- Invited dependency: fragmented state and foreign resources in Brazil's early industrialization -- Grow now, pay later: state indebted industrialization in modern Brazil. Part III. Slow but steady: India: Origins of a fragmented-multiclass state and a sluggish economy: colonial India -- India's fragmented-multiclass state and protected industrialization. Part IV. Dashed expectations: Nigeria: Colonial Nigeria: origins of a neopatrimonial state and a commodity-exporting economy -- Sovereign Nigeria: neopatrimonialism and failure of industrialization -- Conclusion: understanding states and state intervention in the global periphery.
Abstract : The study undertakes a comparative analysis of the state as an economic actor in developing countries. Why have some developing country states been more successful at facilitating industrialization than others? An answer to this question is developed by focusing both on patterns of state construction and patterns of state intervention aimed at promoting industrialization. Four countries are analyzed in detail - South Korea, Brazil, India, and Nigeria - over the twentieth century. The states in these countries varied from cohesive-capitalist (mainly in Korea), through fragmented-multiclass (mainly in India), to neo-patrimonial (mainly in Nigeria). It is argued that cohesive-capitalist states have been most effective at promoting industrialization and neo-patrimonial states the least. The performance of fragmented-multiclass states falls somewhere in the middle. After explaining in detail as to why this should be so, the study traces the origins of these different state types historically, emphasizing the role of different types of colonialisms in the process of state construction in the developing world.
Subject : Industrial policy-- Developing countries.
Subject : Industrialization-- Developing countries.
Subject : Industrialisation-- Pays en voie de développement.
Subject : Politique industrielle-- Pays en voie de développement.
Subject : BUSINESS ECONOMICS-- Development-- Business Development.
Subject : BUSINESS ECONOMICS-- Development-- Economic Development.
Subject : BUSINESS ECONOMICS-- Development-- General.
Subject : BUSINESS ECONOMICS-- Government Business.
Subject : BUSINESS ECONOMICS-- Structural Adjustment.
Subject : Economic policy.
Subject : Industrial policy.
Subject : Industrialisierung
Subject : Industrialization.
Subject : Industriepolitik
Subject : POLITICAL SCIENCE-- Public Policy-- Economic Policy.
Subject : Politics and government
Subject : Politique économique.
Subject : Politique gouvernementale.
Subject : Pouvoir politique.
Subject : Wirtschaftspolitik
Subject : DEVELOPING COUNTRIES.
Subject : DEVELOPMENT.
Subject : ECONOMIC POLICY.
Subject : INDUSTRIAL POLICY.
Subject : Industrialisatie.
Subject : Industrialisation.
Subject : INDUSTRIALIZATION.
Subject : Industriepolitiek.
Subject : POLITICAL CONDITIONS.
Subject : Politique industrielle.
Subject : Developing countries, Economic policy.
Subject : Developing countries, Politics and government.
Subject : Pays en voie de développement, Politique économique.
Subject : Pays en voie de développement, Politique et gouvernement.
Subject : Developing countries.
Subject : Entwicklungsländer
Subject : Pays en développement.
Dewey Classification : ‭338.9/009172/4‬
LC Classification : ‭HD3616.D452‬‭.K64 2004eb‬
NLM classification : ‭83.80‬bcl
: ‭QC 346‬rvk
: ‭QG 020‬rvk
کپی لینک

پیشنهاد خرید
پیوستها
Search result is zero
نظرسنجی
نظرسنجی منابع دیجیتال

1 - آیا از کیفیت منابع دیجیتال راضی هستید؟