|
" Chinese Farms in Zambia: "
Yan Hairong, Barry Sautman, Yan Hairong, et al.
| Document Type
|
:
|
AL
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
1063786
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
LA107415
|
| Call No
|
:
|
10.1163/156921010X515987
|
| Language of Document
|
:
|
English
|
| Main Entry
|
:
|
Barry Sautman
|
|
|
:
|
Yan Hairong
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
Chinese Farms in Zambia: [Article] : From Socialist to “Agro-Imperialist” Engagement?\ Yan Hairong, Barry Sautman, Yan Hairong, et al.
|
| Publication Statement
|
:
|
Leiden: Brill
|
| Title of Periodical
|
:
|
African and Asian Studies
|
| Date
|
:
|
2010
|
| Volume/ Issue Number
|
:
|
9/3
|
| Page No
|
:
|
307–333
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
Participation by Chinese in Zambia’s agriculture has involved three modes of engagement. Two of these, agro-socialist cooperation until the late 1980s and agro-capitalist “win-win,” since the 1990s, can be examined. The third one, an “agro-imperialist” mode, is not an experience, but a speculation, one possible future based on the Chinese state’s potential to allow firms from China to join in the large-scale, export-oriented “land grabs” by big transnational firms that have occurred since food crises in the developing world in the late 2000s. This paper analyzes all three modes of Chinese engagement, but necessarily concentrates on the second, present-day mode, agro-capitalism. We argue that the present Chinese engagement with Zambian agriculture makes small-scale positive contributions to the domestic food market in Zambia. At the same time, its agro-capitalist production involves the exploitation of farm workers that is typically at the core of commercial farming regardless of the national origins of farm owners. We also contend that while Chinese in Zambia and Africa are not carrying out agro-imperialism, they will likely do so if Chinese leaders decide that this practice represents an international standard. Participation by Chinese in Zambia’s agriculture has involved three modes of engagement. Two of these, agro-socialist cooperation until the late 1980s and agro-capitalist “win-win,” since the 1990s, can be examined. The third one, an “agro-imperialist” mode, is not an experience, but a speculation, one possible future based on the Chinese state’s potential to allow firms from China to join in the large-scale, export-oriented “land grabs” by big transnational firms that have occurred since food crises in the developing world in the late 2000s. This paper analyzes all three modes of Chinese engagement, but necessarily concentrates on the second, present-day mode, agro-capitalism. We argue that the present Chinese engagement with Zambian agriculture makes small-scale positive contributions to the domestic food market in Zambia. At the same time, its agro-capitalist production involves the exploitation of farm workers that is typically at the core of commercial farming regardless of the national origins of farm owners. We also contend that while Chinese in Zambia and Africa are not carrying out agro-imperialism, they will likely do so if Chinese leaders decide that this practice represents an international standard.
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
agro-capitalist “win-win”
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
agro-imperialist
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
agro-socialist cooperation
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
Chinese
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
modes of engagement
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
Zambian agriculture
|
| Location & Call number
|
:
|
10.1163/156921010X515987
|
| |