|
" CSO s in Sustainable Development in Ethiopia: "
Nicky Broeckhoven, Desta G/Michael Gidey, Kelemework Tafere Reda, et al.
Document Type
|
:
|
AL
|
Record Number
|
:
|
1064450
|
Doc. No
|
:
|
LA108079
|
Call No
|
:
|
10.1163/17087384-12340063
|
Language of Document
|
:
|
English
|
Main Entry
|
:
|
Desta G/Michael Gidey
|
|
:
|
Dina Townsend
|
|
:
|
Jonathan Verschuuren
|
|
:
|
Kelemework Tafere Reda
|
|
:
|
Nicky Broeckhoven
|
Title & Author
|
:
|
CSO s in Sustainable Development in Ethiopia: [Article] : Past Practices and New Trajectories\ Nicky Broeckhoven, Desta G/Michael Gidey, Kelemework Tafere Reda, et al.
|
Publication Statement
|
:
|
Leiden: Brill | Nijhoff
|
Title of Periodical
|
:
|
African Journal of Legal Studies
|
Date
|
:
|
2020
|
Volume/ Issue Number
|
:
|
13/1
|
Page No
|
:
|
43–72
|
Abstract
|
:
|
We researched how CSO s working in the area of sustainable development responded to regulatory restrictions on advocacy work using Ethiopia as a case study. We found that the restrictive laws had a severe impact: many CSO s had to shut down or limit their operational capacity to service delivery only. Those that survived continued to do advocacy work, disguised as service delivery. This shows that northern stakeholders should not adhere to a strict division between advocacy and service delivery in their funding policy. They also should focus on long-term CSO engagement and long-term CSO funding. In 2019, regulatory reform reopened political space to some extent. The new law envisions a greater role for self-regulation in the civil society sector while still maintaining some degree of State oversight through registration, reporting and funding allocation requirements. Despite these improvements, the sector is still in need of international support and consistent and reliable funding. We researched how CSO s working in the area of sustainable development responded to regulatory restrictions on advocacy work using Ethiopia as a case study. We found that the restrictive laws had a severe impact: many CSO s had to shut down or limit their operational capacity to service delivery only. Those that survived continued to do advocacy work, disguised as service delivery. This shows that northern stakeholders should not adhere to a strict division between advocacy and service delivery in their funding policy. They also should focus on long-term CSO engagement and long-term CSO funding. In 2019, regulatory reform reopened political space to some extent. The new law envisions a greater role for self-regulation in the civil society sector while still maintaining some degree of State oversight through registration, reporting and funding allocation requirements. Despite these improvements, the sector is still in need of international support and consistent and reliable funding. We researched how CSO s working in the area of sustainable development responded to regulatory restrictions on advocacy work using Ethiopia as a case study. We found that the restrictive laws had a severe impact: many CSO s had to shut down or limit their operational capacity to service delivery only. Those that survived continued to do advocacy work, disguised as service delivery. This shows that northern stakeholders should not adhere to a strict division between advocacy and service delivery in their funding policy. They also should focus on long-term CSO engagement and long-term CSO funding. In 2019, regulatory reform reopened political space to some extent. The new law envisions a greater role for self-regulation in the civil society sector while still maintaining some degree of State oversight through registration, reporting and funding allocation requirements. Despite these improvements, the sector is still in need of international support and consistent and reliable funding. We researched how CSO s working in the area of sustainable development responded to regulatory restrictions on advocacy work using Ethiopia as a case study. We found that the restrictive laws had a severe impact: many CSO s had to shut down or limit their operational capacity to service delivery only. Those that survived continued to do advocacy work, disguised as service delivery. This shows that northern stakeholders should not adhere to a strict division between advocacy and service delivery in their funding policy. They also should focus on long-term CSO engagement and long-term CSO funding. In 2019, regulatory reform reopened political space to some extent. The new law envisions a greater role for self-regulation in the civil society sector while still maintaining some degree of State oversight through registration, reporting and funding allocation requirements. Despite these improvements, the sector is still in need of international support and consistent and reliable funding.
|
Descriptor
|
:
|
civil society
|
Descriptor
|
:
|
environmental law
|
Descriptor
|
:
|
Ethiopia
|
Descriptor
|
:
|
human rights
|
Descriptor
|
:
|
sustainable development
|
Location & Call number
|
:
|
10.1163/17087384-12340063
|
| |