|
" Ecclesial Reconstruction, Theological Conservation "
John A. Williams
| Document Type
|
:
|
AL
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
1065755
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
LA109384
|
| Call No
|
:
|
10.1163/17455316-01103003
|
| Language of Document
|
:
|
English
|
| Main Entry
|
:
|
John A. Williams
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
Ecclesial Reconstruction, Theological Conservation [Article]\ John A. Williams
|
| Publication Statement
|
:
|
Leiden: Brill
|
| Title of Periodical
|
:
|
Ecclesiology
|
| Date
|
:
|
2015
|
| Volume/ Issue Number
|
:
|
11/3
|
| Page No
|
:
|
289–305
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
Recent thinking and writing about the regeneration of the churches in Britain is almost always devoted to ways and means: patterns of ministry, styles of worship, methods of communication and models of mission. These contemporary approaches envisage a renewal of the churches that seemingly leaves theology untouched. This article mounts a critique of this strategy of ‘ecclesial reconstruction’ plus ‘theological conservation’ as short-sighted and overly narrow in focus. The situation contrasts with the ‘radical theology’ of the 1960s, in which it was assumed that ecclesial and theological reconstruction go together. The article asks why things are so different today. It considers a possible sociological account of this state of affairs, but argues against it, drawing on sociological and ecclesiological factors to build a case instead for the vital importance of hospitality towards critical and exploratory theological thinking in all initiatives for the reconstruction and renewal of the churches. Recent thinking and writing about the regeneration of the churches in Britain is almost always devoted to ways and means: patterns of ministry, styles of worship, methods of communication and models of mission. These contemporary approaches envisage a renewal of the churches that seemingly leaves theology untouched. This article mounts a critique of this strategy of ‘ecclesial reconstruction’ plus ‘theological conservation’ as short-sighted and overly narrow in focus. The situation contrasts with the ‘radical theology’ of the 1960s, in which it was assumed that ecclesial and theological reconstruction go together. The article asks why things are so different today. It considers a possible sociological account of this state of affairs, but argues against it, drawing on sociological and ecclesiological factors to build a case instead for the vital importance of hospitality towards critical and exploratory theological thinking in all initiatives for the reconstruction and renewal of the churches.
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
church renewal
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
conservatism
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
critical thinking
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
mission strategy
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
radicalism
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
sociology of religion
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
theological tradition
|
| Location & Call number
|
:
|
10.1163/17455316-01103003
|
| |