رکورد قبلیرکورد بعدی

" Iamblichus and the Talisman of Gnosis "


Document Type : AL
Record Number : 1067228
Doc. No : LA110857
Call No : ‭10.1163/2451859X-12340038‬
Language of Document : English
Main Entry : Gregory Shaw
Title & Author : Iamblichus and the Talisman of Gnosis [Article]\ Gregory Shaw
Publication Statement : Leiden: Brill
Title of Periodical : Gnosis: Journal of Gnostic Studies
Date : 2017
Volume/ Issue Number : 2/2
Page No : 235–245
Abstract : For Neoplatonic philosophers, the Delphic oracle had authoritatively characterized their two great teachers, Iamblichus and Porphyry. Later Platonists cited the Pythia’s oracular pronouncement, “The Syrian is full of god; the Phoenican a polymath” as revealed wisdom. The Syrian Iamblichus, “full of god,” was more highly regarded in Platonic circles than the learned Porphyry, but because Iamblichus’ theurgical Platonism vanished after the sixth century, we are left with only “learned” reports about theurgic divination. Contemporary scholars are polymaths; we are the children of Porphyry. So, when Porphyry asks for a precise definition of theurgic divination, it seems entirely reasonable, and it is hard for us to appreciate Iamblichus’ barbed response. He chastises Porphyry for presuming that divination can be discursively explained and says he needs a talisman (ἀλεξιοφάρµακον) to protect him from his discursive addiction. Divination, he says, can only be known through experiences that awaken the soul to an innate gnosis that precedes dualist thinking. This paper will explore that talismanic gnosis. For Neoplatonic philosophers, the Delphic oracle had authoritatively characterized their two great teachers, Iamblichus and Porphyry. Later Platonists cited the Pythia’s oracular pronouncement, “The Syrian is full of god; the Phoenican a polymath” as revealed wisdom. The Syrian Iamblichus, “full of god,” was more highly regarded in Platonic circles than the learned Porphyry, but because Iamblichus’ theurgical Platonism vanished after the sixth century, we are left with only “learned” reports about theurgic divination. Contemporary scholars are polymaths; we are the children of Porphyry. So, when Porphyry asks for a precise definition of theurgic divination, it seems entirely reasonable, and it is hard for us to appreciate Iamblichus’ barbed response. He chastises Porphyry for presuming that divination can be discursively explained and says he needs a talisman (ἀλεξιοφάρµακον) to protect him from his discursive addiction. Divination, he says, can only be known through experiences that awaken the soul to an innate gnosis that precedes dualist thinking. This paper will explore that talismanic gnosis.
Descriptor : Damascius
Descriptor : discursive thought
Descriptor : divination
Descriptor : gnosis
Descriptor : Iamblichus
Descriptor : Neoplatonism
Descriptor : Porphyry
Descriptor : theurgy
Location & Call number : ‭10.1163/2451859X-12340038‬
کپی لینک

پیشنهاد خرید
پیوستها
عنوان :
نام فایل :
نوع عام محتوا :
نوع ماده :
فرمت :
سایز :
عرض :
طول :
10.1163-2451859X-12340038_7711.pdf
10.1163-2451859X-12340038.pdf
مقاله لاتین
متن
application/pdf
629.59 KB
85
85
نظرسنجی
نظرسنجی منابع دیجیتال

1 - آیا از کیفیت منابع دیجیتال راضی هستید؟