|
" Carl Jung, John Layard and Jordan Peterson "
Gary Clark
| Document Type
|
:
|
AL
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
1069058
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
LA112687
|
| Call No
|
:
|
10.1163/19409060-20201001
|
| Language of Document
|
:
|
English
|
| Main Entry
|
:
|
Gary Clark
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
Carl Jung, John Layard and Jordan Peterson [Article]\ Gary Clark
|
| Publication Statement
|
:
|
Leiden: Brill
|
| Title of Periodical
|
:
|
International Journal of Jungian Studies
|
| Date
|
:
|
2020
|
| Volume/ Issue Number
|
:
|
12/2
|
| Page No
|
:
|
129–158
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
In this article I discuss the relationship between analytical psychology and theories of human social evolution. More specifically I look at debates in evolutionary studies and anthropology regarding the priority of matrilineal social structure in the emergence of Homo sapiens. These debates were occurring in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and they provide the context for many of the assumptions of psychoanalysis and analytical psychology. In this essay I will explore these issues in relation to analytical psychology. I will also discuss the work of anthropologist John Layard who proposed matriliny was humanity’s original form of social organisation. Interestingly, Layard’s field work had significant impact on Jung. I will also compare the work of Layard, and other theorists who adopt matrilineal theories of human social evolution, with the theories of Jordan Peterson. Peterson has developed an idiosyncratic evolutionary conception of analytical psychology, one in which he explicitly rejects the notion of matrilineal priority in human evolution. He also adopts certain assumptions about the evolutionary origins of contemporary socio-political hierarchy, assumptions I argue are not supported by data from numerous fields of scientific enquiry. In this article I discuss the relationship between analytical psychology and theories of human social evolution. More specifically I look at debates in evolutionary studies and anthropology regarding the priority of matrilineal social structure in the emergence of Homo sapiens. These debates were occurring in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries and they provide the context for many of the assumptions of psychoanalysis and analytical psychology. In this essay I will explore these issues in relation to analytical psychology. I will also discuss the work of anthropologist John Layard who proposed matriliny was humanity’s original form of social organisation. Interestingly, Layard’s field work had significant impact on Jung. I will also compare the work of Layard, and other theorists who adopt matrilineal theories of human social evolution, with the theories of Jordan Peterson. Peterson has developed an idiosyncratic evolutionary conception of analytical psychology, one in which he explicitly rejects the notion of matrilineal priority in human evolution. He also adopts certain assumptions about the evolutionary origins of contemporary socio-political hierarchy, assumptions I argue are not supported by data from numerous fields of scientific enquiry.
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
analytical psychology
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
human evolution
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
John Layard
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
Jordan Peterson
|
| Location & Call number
|
:
|
10.1163/19409060-20201001
|
| |