Discrimination within Religious Schools

مرکز و کتابخانه مطالعات اسلامی به زبان های اروپایی

منو

" Discrimination within Religious Schools "
Jeff Spinner-Halev

Document Type	:	AL
Record Number	:	1072436
Doc. No	:	LA116065
Call No	:	‭10.1163/221248112X638163‬
Language of Document	:	English
Main Entry	:	Jeff Spinner-Halev
Title & Author	:	Discrimination within Religious Schools [Article]\ Jeff Spinner-Halev
Publication Statement	:	Leiden: Brill \| Nijhoff
Title of Periodical	:	Journal of Law, Religion and State
Date	:	2012
Volume/ Issue Number	:	1/1
Page No	:	45–59
Abstract	:	Places of contact between religion and the state has increased considerably over time; as this overlap has increased, liberals have increasingly seen fit to call for state intervention in religions that are internally discriminatory in the name of equal citizenship. By looking at the issue of direct and indirect state support for discriminatory schools, I argue for a more pluralistic and tolerant view of religion than that of many liberals. Preserving diversity is an important liberal good that should not lost sight of, though there are limits to the kinds of discrimination the liberal state should support. Much of my argument rests on the distinction between direct and indirect support. The liberal state should impose strict standards on funds it grants directly to organizations, but it should be more relaxed for indirect support it gives, except in exceptional circumstances. Places of contact between religion and the state has increased considerably over time; as this overlap has increased, liberals have increasingly seen fit to call for state intervention in religions that are internally discriminatory in the name of equal citizenship. By looking at the issue of direct and indirect state support for discriminatory schools, I argue for a more pluralistic and tolerant view of religion than that of many liberals. Preserving diversity is an important liberal good that should not lost sight of, though there are limits to the kinds of discrimination the liberal state should support. Much of my argument rests on the distinction between direct and indirect support. The liberal state should impose strict standards on funds it grants directly to organizations, but it should be more relaxed for indirect support it gives, except in exceptional circumstances.
Descriptor	:	discrimination
Descriptor	:	liberalism
Descriptor	:	pluralism
Descriptor	:	religion
Location & Call number	:	‭10.1163/221248112X638163‬