|
" “In the west, they laughed at him: "
Christine Hayes
Document Type
|
:
|
AL
|
Record Number
|
:
|
1072455
|
Doc. No
|
:
|
LA116084
|
Call No
|
:
|
10.1163/22124810-00202002
|
Language of Document
|
:
|
English
|
Main Entry
|
:
|
Christine Hayes
|
Title & Author
|
:
|
“In the west, they laughed at him: [Article] : ” The mocking realists of the Babylonian Talmud\ Christine Hayes
|
Publication Statement
|
:
|
Leiden: Brill | Nijhoff
|
Title of Periodical
|
:
|
Journal of Law, Religion and State
|
Date
|
:
|
2013
|
Volume/ Issue Number
|
:
|
2/2
|
Page No
|
:
|
137–167
|
Abstract
|
:
|
In the present article I examine the rhetorical function of the phrase “in the west [the Land of Israel], they laughed at him/it” found in dialectical halakhic contexts in the Babylonian Talmud. I argue that the literary motif of “mocking westerners” allows Babylonian rabbinic authors/redactors to voice reservations about the nominalist or anti-realist orientation of some rabbinic legal interpretation as seen in the use of legal fictions, contrary-to-fact presumptions and judgments, a high degree of intentionalism, and acontextual interpretive techniques. The ability of Babylonian rabbinic authors/redactors to depict the rabbis’ nominalist approach as the object of mockery by various external and, in this case, internal others indicates a high degree of rabbinic self-awareness regarding legal interpretative assumptions and methods. The paper concludes by suggesting that rabbinic nominalism flows from a distinctive and somewhat scandalous rabbinic understanding of divine law—one that self-consciously rejects an ideal of divine law that assumes its truth and verisimilitude. In the present article I examine the rhetorical function of the phrase “in the west [the Land of Israel], they laughed at him/it” found in dialectical halakhic contexts in the Babylonian Talmud. I argue that the literary motif of “mocking westerners” allows Babylonian rabbinic authors/redactors to voice reservations about the nominalist or anti-realist orientation of some rabbinic legal interpretation as seen in the use of legal fictions, contrary-to-fact presumptions and judgments, a high degree of intentionalism, and acontextual interpretive techniques. The ability of Babylonian rabbinic authors/redactors to depict the rabbis’ nominalist approach as the object of mockery by various external and, in this case, internal others indicates a high degree of rabbinic self-awareness regarding legal interpretative assumptions and methods. The paper concludes by suggesting that rabbinic nominalism flows from a distinctive and somewhat scandalous rabbinic understanding of divine law—one that self-consciously rejects an ideal of divine law that assumes its truth and verisimilitude.
|
Descriptor
|
:
|
interpretation
|
Descriptor
|
:
|
nominalism
|
Descriptor
|
:
|
realism
|
Descriptor
|
:
|
reflexivity
|
Location & Call number
|
:
|
10.1163/22124810-00202002
|
| |