|
" Commerce, Religion, and the Rule of Law "
Nathan B. Oman
| Document Type
|
:
|
AL
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
1072500
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
LA116129
|
| Call No
|
:
|
10.1163/22124810-00602004
|
| Language of Document
|
:
|
English
|
| Main Entry
|
:
|
Nathan B. Oman
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
Commerce, Religion, and the Rule of Law [Article]\ Nathan B. Oman
|
| Publication Statement
|
:
|
Leiden: Brill | Nijhoff
|
| Title of Periodical
|
:
|
Journal of Law, Religion and State
|
| Date
|
:
|
2018
|
| Volume/ Issue Number
|
:
|
6/2-3
|
| Page No
|
:
|
213–235
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
The rule of law and religion can act as commercial substitutes. Both can create the trust required for material prosperity. The rule of law simplifies social interactions, turning people into formal legal agents and generating a map of society that the state can observe and control, thus credibly committing to the enforcement of the legal rights demanded by impersonal markets. Religion, in contrast, embraces complex social identities. Within these communities, economic actors can monitor and sanction misbehavior. Both approaches have benefits and problems. The rule of law allows for trade among strangers, fostering peaceful pluralism. However, law breeds what Montesquieu called “a certain feeling for exact justice” that crowds out deeper forms of relation. Religious commerce fosters precisely such communities. Religious commerce, however, does not create bridges between strangers as effectively as the formal rule of law. Furthermore, the state tends to be suspicious of tight religious communities, particularly when they are commercially successful. The rule of law and religion can act as commercial substitutes. Both can create the trust required for material prosperity. The rule of law simplifies social interactions, turning people into formal legal agents and generating a map of society that the state can observe and control, thus credibly committing to the enforcement of the legal rights demanded by impersonal markets. Religion, in contrast, embraces complex social identities. Within these communities, economic actors can monitor and sanction misbehavior. Both approaches have benefits and problems. The rule of law allows for trade among strangers, fostering peaceful pluralism. However, law breeds what Montesquieu called “a certain feeling for exact justice” that crowds out deeper forms of relation. Religious commerce fosters precisely such communities. Religious commerce, however, does not create bridges between strangers as effectively as the formal rule of law. Furthermore, the state tends to be suspicious of tight religious communities, particularly when they are commercially successful.
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
History of Religion
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
Human Rights and Humanitarian Law
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
markets
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
religion
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
Religious Studies
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
rule of law
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
trust
|
| Location & Call number
|
:
|
10.1163/22124810-00602004
|
| |