رکورد قبلیرکورد بعدی

" “Wipe Out Lines of Division (Not Distinctions)” "


Document Type : AL
Record Number : 1073265
Doc. No : LA116894
Call No : ‭10.1163/15697312-01101025‬
Language of Document : English
Main Entry : George Harinck
Title & Author : “Wipe Out Lines of Division (Not Distinctions)” [Article]\ George Harinck
Publication Statement : Leiden: Brill
Title of Periodical : Journal of Reformed Theology
Date : 2017
Volume/ Issue Number : 11/1-2
Page No : 81–98
Abstract : Race was not a dominant factor in neo-Calvinism. Rather, stress was laid on the universal character of Christianity, especially in the case of Herman Bavinck. While some of the South African PhD students at the Vrije Universiteit’s defended apartheid with reference to neo-Calvinism, it was B.B. Keet—who would become a noted critic of apartheid—who adopted Bavinck’s views. As a professor in Stellenbosch, Keet initially accepted apartheid for cultural and practical reasons, but he became critical when South Africa officially implemented apartheid policy in 1948. This resulted in his book Whither, South Africa?, in which he rejected the theological arguments undergirding apartheid with arguments almost literally derived from Bavinck. It is clear from this case study that neo-Calvinism was employed not only to support apartheid, but also to criticize it as well. In the Netherlands his stand was recognized and shared by two more of Bavinck’s students: J.J. Buskes and J.H. Bavinck. Keet met with opposition within his own circles but stuck to his position and inspired his student, the apartheid critic C.F. Beyers Naudé. Race was not a dominant factor in neo-Calvinism. Rather, stress was laid on the universal character of Christianity, especially in the case of Herman Bavinck. While some of the South African PhD students at the Vrije Universiteit’s defended apartheid with reference to neo-Calvinism, it was B.B. Keet—who would become a noted critic of apartheid—who adopted Bavinck’s views. As a professor in Stellenbosch, Keet initially accepted apartheid for cultural and practical reasons, but he became critical when South Africa officially implemented apartheid policy in 1948. This resulted in his book Whither, South Africa?, in which he rejected the theological arguments undergirding apartheid with arguments almost literally derived from Bavinck. It is clear from this case study that neo-Calvinism was employed not only to support apartheid, but also to criticize it as well. In the Netherlands his stand was recognized and shared by two more of Bavinck’s students: J.J. Buskes and J.H. Bavinck. Keet met with opposition within his own circles but stuck to his position and inspired his student, the apartheid critic C.F. Beyers Naudé.
Descriptor : A. Kuyper
Descriptor : apartheid
Descriptor : B.B. Keet
Descriptor : church history
Descriptor : H. Bavinck
Descriptor : Neo-Calvinism
Location & Call number : ‭10.1163/15697312-01101025‬
کپی لینک

پیشنهاد خرید
پیوستها
عنوان :
نام فایل :
نوع عام محتوا :
نوع ماده :
فرمت :
سایز :
عرض :
طول :
10.1163-15697312-01101025_19681.pdf
10.1163-15697312-01101025.pdf
مقاله لاتین
متن
application/pdf
297.17 KB
85
85
نظرسنجی
نظرسنجی منابع دیجیتال

1 - آیا از کیفیت منابع دیجیتال راضی هستید؟