This page uses JavaScript and requires a JavaScript enabled browser.Your browser is not JavaScript enabled.
مرکز و کتابخانه مطالعات اسلامی به زبان های اروپایی
منو
درگاههای جستجو
مدارک
جستجوی پیشرفته
مرور
جستجو در سایر کتابخانه ها
مستندات
جستجوی پیشرفته
مرور
منابع دیجیتال
تمام متن
اصطلاحنامه
درختواره
پرسش و پاسخ
سوالات متداول
پرسش از کتابدار
پیگیری پرسش
ورود
ثبت نام
راهنما
خطا
رکورد قبلی
رکورد بعدی
"
Inter / national / ization
"
Tristan Leperlier
Document Type
:
AL
Record Number
:
1075873
Doc. No
:
LA119502
Call No
:
10.1163/24056480-00504010
Language of Document
:
English
Main Entry
:
Tristan Leperlier
Title & Author
:
Inter / national / ization [Article]\ Tristan Leperlier
Publication Statement
:
Leiden: Brill
Title of Periodical
:
Journal of World Literature
Date
:
2020
Volume/ Issue Number
:
5/4
Page No
:
527–544
Abstract
:
Using the case of Algeria, this article shows that the national and the international—also nationalization and internationalization—in peripheral literary fields do not happen in opposition to each other but are two sides of the same coin. I argue that we should think of this as a transnational literary field. Even though they compete with one another, writers within these fields are always connected. Furthermore, the characteristics of the two poles, in terms of their relative autonomy from political and economic constraints, are not as systematically opposed to one another as Pascale Casanova suggests. Nationalization and internationalization are also frequently intertwined: the material internationalization of texts and writers can reinforce the symbolic nationalization of a literature (e.g. its identification in the international world as “Algerian literature”). Recognizing this also calls into question assertions by scholars such as Homi Bhabha who assert that internationalization of literature goes hand in hand with its hybridization. Using the case of Algeria, this article shows that the national and the international—also nationalization and internationalization—in peripheral literary fields do not happen in opposition to each other but are two sides of the same coin. I argue that we should think of this as a transnational literary field. Even though they compete with one another, writers within these fields are always connected. Furthermore, the characteristics of the two poles, in terms of their relative autonomy from political and economic constraints, are not as systematically opposed to one another as Pascale Casanova suggests. Nationalization and internationalization are also frequently intertwined: the material internationalization of texts and writers can reinforce the symbolic nationalization of a literature (e.g. its identification in the international world as “Algerian literature”). Recognizing this also calls into question assertions by scholars such as Homi Bhabha who assert that internationalization of literature goes hand in hand with its hybridization.
Descriptor
:
Algeria
Descriptor
:
field theory
Descriptor
:
France
Descriptor
:
postcolonial
Descriptor
:
transnational
Location & Call number
:
10.1163/24056480-00504010
https://lib.clisel.com/site/catalogue/1075873
کپی لینک
پیشنهاد خرید
پیوستها
عنوان :
نام فایل :
نوع عام محتوا :
نوع ماده :
فرمت :
سایز :
عرض :
طول :
10.1163-24056480-00504010_24872.pdf
10.1163-24056480-00504010.pdf
مقاله لاتین
متن
application/pdf
284.30 KB
85
85
نمایش
نظرسنجی
نظرسنجی منابع دیجیتال
1 - آیا از کیفیت منابع دیجیتال راضی هستید؟
X
کم
متوسط
زیاد
ذخیره
پاک کن