رکورد قبلیرکورد بعدی

" The Emergence of “Religious Studies” (zongjiaoxue) in Late Imperial and Republican China, 1890–1949 "


Document Type : AL
Record Number : 1079177
Doc. No : LA122806
Call No : ‭10.1163/15685276-12341355‬
Language of Document : English
Main Entry : Christian Meyer
Title & Author : The Emergence of “Religious Studies” (zongjiaoxue) in Late Imperial and Republican China, 1890–1949 [Article]\ Christian Meyer
Publication Statement : Leiden: Brill
Title of Periodical : Numen
Date : 2015
Volume/ Issue Number : 62/1
Page No : 40–75
Abstract : This article contextualizes the rise of “early religious studies in China” with its apex in the 1920s within the heated debates on the role of religion in a modern Chinese society. While the most recent development of religious studies (zongjiaoxue) in China (including Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan) is well known, its early emergence in the late Qing and Republican periods (ca. 1890–1949) has been a neglected topic. The author demonstrates first how antagonistic anti-religious and affirmative positions, received from Western modernization discourse and informed by the contested character of the concept of religion itself, led to the emergence of this new discipline in Republican China as a product of broader discourses on modernization. Secondly, the article evaluates the limited institutionalization of religious studies as a distinct “full” discipline in relation to the broader interdisciplinary “field” of research and public debates on religion. While the interdisciplinary character is typical of the field in general (also in the West), the limited degree of “full disciplinarity” depended on specific, local discursive and political factors of its time. As “religion” appears as an important modern discourse in East Asia, the early emergence of religious studies in China thereby reflects social, political, and intellectual transitions from Imperial to Republican China, and offers a unique perspective on Asian discourses on religious and secular modernities. This article contextualizes the rise of “early religious studies in China” with its apex in the 1920s within the heated debates on the role of religion in a modern Chinese society. While the most recent development of religious studies (zongjiaoxue) in China (including Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan) is well known, its early emergence in the late Qing and Republican periods (ca. 1890–1949) has been a neglected topic. The author demonstrates first how antagonistic anti-religious and affirmative positions, received from Western modernization discourse and informed by the contested character of the concept of religion itself, led to the emergence of this new discipline in Republican China as a product of broader discourses on modernization. Secondly, the article evaluates the limited institutionalization of religious studies as a distinct “full” discipline in relation to the broader interdisciplinary “field” of research and public debates on religion. While the interdisciplinary character is typical of the field in general (also in the West), the limited degree of “full disciplinarity” depended on specific, local discursive and political factors of its time. As “religion” appears as an important modern discourse in East Asia, the early emergence of religious studies in China thereby reflects social, political, and intellectual transitions from Imperial to Republican China, and offers a unique perspective on Asian discourses on religious and secular modernities.
Descriptor : comparative religion
Descriptor : history of religions
Descriptor : late Qing dynasty
Descriptor : religious studies in Asia
Descriptor : republican China 1912–1949
Descriptor : science of religion
Descriptor : Shūkyōgaku
Descriptor : zongjiaoxue
Location & Call number : ‭10.1163/15685276-12341355‬
کپی لینک

پیشنهاد خرید
پیوستها
عنوان :
نام فایل :
نوع عام محتوا :
نوع ماده :
فرمت :
سایز :
عرض :
طول :
10.1163-15685276-12341355_31478.pdf
10.1163-15685276-12341355.pdf
مقاله لاتین
متن
application/pdf
866.56 KB
85
85
نظرسنجی
نظرسنجی منابع دیجیتال

1 - آیا از کیفیت منابع دیجیتال راضی هستید؟