This page uses JavaScript and requires a JavaScript enabled browser.Your browser is not JavaScript enabled.
مرکز و کتابخانه مطالعات اسلامی به زبان های اروپایی
منو
درگاههای جستجو
مدارک
جستجوی پیشرفته
مرور
جستجو در سایر کتابخانه ها
مستندات
جستجوی پیشرفته
مرور
منابع دیجیتال
تمام متن
اصطلاحنامه
درختواره
پرسش و پاسخ
سوالات متداول
پرسش از کتابدار
پیگیری پرسش
ورود
ثبت نام
راهنما
خطا
رکورد قبلی
رکورد بعدی
"
What Game Are We Playing?:
"
Indrek Peedu
Document Type
:
AL
Record Number
:
1079247
Doc. No
:
LA122876
Call No
:
10.1163/15685276-12341488
Language of Document
:
English
Main Entry
:
Indrek Peedu
Title & Author
:
What Game Are We Playing?: [Article] : A New Look at the Identity and Beginning of the Study of Religion\ Indrek Peedu
Publication Statement
:
Leiden: Brill
Title of Periodical
:
Numen
Date
:
2018
Volume/ Issue Number
:
65/1
Page No
:
88–108
Abstract
:
This article aims to analyze how scholars of religions have studied the history of the discipline itself, with particular emphasis on the question of its beginning. Although situating the beginning of the discipline in the late 19th century is prevalent, there are dissenting voices in this debate. Interestingly, a similar discussion exists in the history of science. There, Andrew Cunningham has argued in favor of understanding scientific practice as a human activity and thus writing histories of science as histories of an activity. The latter part of this article explains how implementing Cunningham’s approach can be useful for the study of the history of religious studies, making it possible to study the intellectual and institutional aspects as parts of one whole. I will draw attention to how this approach can help us analyze the question of the beginnings of the discipline. This article aims to analyze how scholars of religions have studied the history of the discipline itself, with particular emphasis on the question of its beginning. Although situating the beginning of the discipline in the late 19th century is prevalent, there are dissenting voices in this debate. Interestingly, a similar discussion exists in the history of science. There, Andrew Cunningham has argued in favor of understanding scientific practice as a human activity and thus writing histories of science as histories of an activity. The latter part of this article explains how implementing Cunningham’s approach can be useful for the study of the history of religious studies, making it possible to study the intellectual and institutional aspects as parts of one whole. I will draw attention to how this approach can help us analyze the question of the beginnings of the discipline.
Descriptor
:
Comparative
Religion Religious Studies
Descriptor
:
General
Descriptor
:
historiography
Descriptor
:
History of Religion
Descriptor
:
history of religious studies
Descriptor
:
history of science
Descriptor
:
methodology
Descriptor
:
Religion
Society
Descriptor
:
Religion in Antiquity
Descriptor
:
Religious Studies
Descriptor
:
Social Sciences
Descriptor
:
Study of religion
Location & Call number
:
10.1163/15685276-12341488
https://lib.clisel.com/site/catalogue/1079247
کپی لینک
پیشنهاد خرید
پیوستها
عنوان :
نام فایل :
نوع عام محتوا :
نوع ماده :
فرمت :
سایز :
عرض :
طول :
10.1163-15685276-12341488_31618.pdf
10.1163-15685276-12341488.pdf
مقاله لاتین
متن
application/pdf
640.42 KB
85
85
نمایش
نظرسنجی
نظرسنجی منابع دیجیتال
1 - آیا از کیفیت منابع دیجیتال راضی هستید؟
X
کم
متوسط
زیاد
ذخیره
پاک کن