Did E.N. Bell Convert to the ’New Issue’ in 1915?

مرکز و کتابخانه مطالعات اسلامی به زبان های اروپایی

منو

" Did E.N. Bell Convert to the ’New Issue’ in 1915? "
Thomas A. Fudge

Document Type	:	AL
Record Number	:	1079867
Doc. No	:	LA123496
Call No	:	‭10.1163/17455251-00901007‬
Language of Document	:	English
Main Entry	:	Thomas A. Fudge
Title & Author	:	Did E.N. Bell Convert to the ’New Issue’ in 1915? [Article]\ Thomas A. Fudge
Publication Statement	:	Leiden: Brill
Title of Periodical	:	Journal of Pentecostal Theology
Date	:	2001
Volume/ Issue Number	:	9/1
Page No	:	122–140
Abstract	:	Excoriated on charges of theological weakness, indecisiveness and compromise from 1915 right down to the present, E.N. Bell remains one of the controversial and contested figures within early American Pentecostalism. The point of contention was Bell’s rebaptism in 1915 and alleged adherence to the ’new issue’. Trinitarian Pentecostals thought Bell had defected while Oneness Pentecostals continue to view Bell as a backslider from the truth. An analysis of the documentary evidence concludes that both perspectives were, and are, incorrect. Excoriated on charges of theological weakness, indecisiveness and compromise from 1915 right down to the present, E.N. Bell remains one of the controversial and contested figures within early American Pentecostalism. The point of contention was Bell’s rebaptism in 1915 and alleged adherence to the ’new issue’. Trinitarian Pentecostals thought Bell had defected while Oneness Pentecostals continue to view Bell as a backslider from the truth. An analysis of the documentary evidence concludes that both perspectives were, and are, incorrect.
Location & Call number	:	‭10.1163/17455251-00901007‬