This page uses JavaScript and requires a JavaScript enabled browser.Your browser is not JavaScript enabled.
مرکز و کتابخانه مطالعات اسلامی به زبان های اروپایی
منو
درگاههای جستجو
مدارک
جستجوی پیشرفته
مرور
جستجو در سایر کتابخانه ها
مستندات
جستجوی پیشرفته
مرور
منابع دیجیتال
تمام متن
اصطلاحنامه
درختواره
پرسش و پاسخ
سوالات متداول
پرسش از کتابدار
پیگیری پرسش
ورود
ثبت نام
راهنما
خطا
رکورد قبلی
رکورد بعدی
"
“As Far as My Poor Memory Suggested”:
"
Edwina Murphy
Document Type
:
AL
Record Number
:
1085372
Doc. No
:
LA129001
Call No
:
10.1163/15700720-12341183
Language of Document
:
English
Main Entry
:
Edwina Murphy
Title & Author
:
“As Far as My Poor Memory Suggested”: [Article] : Cyprian’s Compilation of Ad Quirinum\ Edwina Murphy
Publication Statement
:
Leiden: Brill
Title of Periodical
:
Vigiliae Christianae
Date
:
2014
Volume/ Issue Number
:
68/5
Page No
:
533–550
Abstract
:
The question of who compiled Ad Quirinum remains unresolved. The previous consensus that it was indeed Cyprian, based largely on Koch’s work, was challenged by Bobertz over twenty years ago. Since then, the issue has received little attention. Here I refute Bobertz’s main arguments for believing that the collection existed prior to Cyprian’s conversion. I argue that textual variations between Ad Quirinum and Cyprian’s letters and treatises do not rule out Cyprian being the compiler, as similar variations also occur in Cyprian’s uncontested works. I examine the role of tradition and memory in scriptural citation and show how Cyprian’s own catechumenate assisted in his preparation of Ad Quirinum. I also demonstrate that there is no conflict between Test. 3.28 and Cyprian’s practice in the wake of the Decian persecution and consider why Pontius did not include the work in his list of treatises. The question of who compiled Ad Quirinum remains unresolved. The previous consensus that it was indeed Cyprian, based largely on Koch’s work, was challenged by Bobertz over twenty years ago. Since then, the issue has received little attention. Here I refute Bobertz’s main arguments for believing that the collection existed prior to Cyprian’s conversion. I argue that textual variations between Ad Quirinum and Cyprian’s letters and treatises do not rule out Cyprian being the compiler, as similar variations also occur in Cyprian’s uncontested works. I examine the role of tradition and memory in scriptural citation and show how Cyprian’s own catechumenate assisted in his preparation of Ad Quirinum. I also demonstrate that there is no conflict between Test. 3.28 and Cyprian’s practice in the wake of the Decian persecution and consider why Pontius did not include the work in his list of treatises.
Descriptor
:
Ad Quirinum
Descriptor
:
Bobertz
Descriptor
:
Cyprian
Descriptor
:
scriptural citation
Descriptor
:
testimonia
Descriptor
:
tradition
Location & Call number
:
10.1163/15700720-12341183
https://lib.clisel.com/site/catalogue/1085372
کپی لینک
پیشنهاد خرید
پیوستها
عنوان :
نام فایل :
نوع عام محتوا :
نوع ماده :
فرمت :
سایز :
عرض :
طول :
10.1163-15700720-12341183_43864.pdf
10.1163-15700720-12341183.pdf
مقاله لاتین
متن
application/pdf
647.36 KB
85
85
نمایش
نظرسنجی
نظرسنجی منابع دیجیتال
1 - آیا از کیفیت منابع دیجیتال راضی هستید؟
X
کم
متوسط
زیاد
ذخیره
پاک کن