|
" Preaching Adam in John Chrysostom and Augustine of Hippo "
Douglas E. Finn, Anthony Dupont, Douglas E. Finn, et al.
| Document Type
|
:
|
AL
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
1085508
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
LA129137
|
| Call No
|
:
|
10.1163/15700720-12341397
|
| Language of Document
|
:
|
English
|
| Main Entry
|
:
|
Anthony Dupont
|
|
|
:
|
Douglas E. Finn
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
Preaching Adam in John Chrysostom and Augustine of Hippo [Article]\ Douglas E. Finn, Anthony Dupont, Douglas E. Finn, et al.
|
| Publication Statement
|
:
|
Leiden: Brill
|
| Title of Periodical
|
:
|
Vigiliae Christianae
|
| Date
|
:
|
2019
|
| Volume/ Issue Number
|
:
|
73/2
|
| Page No
|
:
|
190–217
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
Is Adam merely a bad moral example, or has his first sin left a lasting impact on the human condition? The current paper revisits the traditional juxtaposition between John Chrysostom and Augustine of Hippo as holding, respectively, a preference for humankind’s autonomy and heteronomy. The way both perceived Adam as an example serves, in this paper, as a concrete case study. First, we investigate how both preachers understand the notion of exemplarity, and how they develop their own pedagogy based on examples. Next, we observe how both preachers apply these pastoral didactics to the first man as a role model. The historical person of Adam, and the eschatological consequences of his fall, play a prominent role in their respective homiletic oeuvres. Chrysostom understands Adam’s primordial sin as a bad example—an instructive example of behavior to be avoided and a therapeutic example that instils in us gratitude for God’s mercy. Augustine, by contrast, is quite hesitant to consider Adam merely an example, since he prefers to stress the ontological solidarity that the whole of humanity shares with Adam. Is Adam merely a bad moral example, or has his first sin left a lasting impact on the human condition? The current paper revisits the traditional juxtaposition between John Chrysostom and Augustine of Hippo as holding, respectively, a preference for humankind’s autonomy and heteronomy. The way both perceived Adam as an example serves, in this paper, as a concrete case study. First, we investigate how both preachers understand the notion of exemplarity, and how they develop their own pedagogy based on examples. Next, we observe how both preachers apply these pastoral didactics to the first man as a role model. The historical person of Adam, and the eschatological consequences of his fall, play a prominent role in their respective homiletic oeuvres. Chrysostom understands Adam’s primordial sin as a bad example—an instructive example of behavior to be avoided and a therapeutic example that instils in us gratitude for God’s mercy. Augustine, by contrast, is quite hesitant to consider Adam merely an example, since he prefers to stress the ontological solidarity that the whole of humanity shares with Adam.
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
Adam
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
Augustine of Hippo
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
exemplarity
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
John Chrysostom
|
| Descriptor
|
:
|
sermons
|
| Location & Call number
|
:
|
10.1163/15700720-12341397
|
| |