|
" Peter Singers Interpretation of Christian Biblical Environmental Ethics "
Cara Beed, Clive Beed, Cara Beed, et al.
Document Type
|
:
|
AL
|
Record Number
|
:
|
1086010
|
Doc. No
|
:
|
LA129639
|
Call No
|
:
|
10.1163/156853598X00055
|
Language of Document
|
:
|
English
|
Main Entry
|
:
|
Cara Beed
|
|
:
|
Clive Beed
|
Title & Author
|
:
|
Peter Singers Interpretation of Christian Biblical Environmental Ethics [Article]\ Cara Beed, Clive Beed, Cara Beed, et al.
|
Publication Statement
|
:
|
Leiden: Brill
|
Title of Periodical
|
:
|
Worldviews: Global Religions, Culture, and Ecology
|
Date
|
:
|
1998
|
Volume/ Issue Number
|
:
|
2/1
|
Page No
|
:
|
53–68
|
Abstract
|
:
|
Peter Singer's (1990 and 1993) interpretations of Biblical texts dealing with the natural world are evaluated in the light of recent Biblical scholarship. The texts in question are among those in the Bible relating to Christian ethical teaching about the natural world. The specific texts Singer examined concern the meaning of dominion and the flood of the earth in the book of Genesis in the Old Testament, particular teaching by the apostle Paul in the book 1 Corinthians in the New Testament, and certain actions by Jesus in the New Testament book of Mark. Singer's interpretations have a lengthy pedigree commonly used to hold Biblical teaching partly responsible for adverse Western attitudes to nature. This article argues that such interpretations contradict a deal of recent Biblical scholarship on the texts at issue. Peter Singer's (1990 and 1993) interpretations of Biblical texts dealing with the natural world are evaluated in the light of recent Biblical scholarship. The texts in question are among those in the Bible relating to Christian ethical teaching about the natural world. The specific texts Singer examined concern the meaning of dominion and the flood of the earth in the book of Genesis in the Old Testament, particular teaching by the apostle Paul in the book 1 Corinthians in the New Testament, and certain actions by Jesus in the New Testament book of Mark. Singer's interpretations have a lengthy pedigree commonly used to hold Biblical teaching partly responsible for adverse Western attitudes to nature. This article argues that such interpretations contradict a deal of recent Biblical scholarship on the texts at issue.
|
Location & Call number
|
:
|
10.1163/156853598X00055
|
| |