|
" Islamic thought in China : "
edited by Jonathan Lipman.
| Document Type
|
:
|
BL
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
1090451
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
bc1010212
|
| Language of Document
|
:
|
English
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
Islamic thought in China : : Sino-Muslim intellectual evolution from the 17th to the 21st century /\ edited by Jonathan Lipman.
|
| Publication Statement
|
:
|
Edinburgh :: Edinburgh University Press,, [2016]
|
|
|
:
|
, ©2016
|
| Page. NO
|
:
|
1 online resource (xx, 268 pages)
|
| ISBN
|
:
|
9781474402286
|
|
|
:
|
: 1474402283
|
|
|
:
|
: 1474414931
|
|
|
:
|
: 9781474414937
|
|
|
:
|
9781474402279
|
|
|
:
|
1474402275
|
|
|
:
|
9781474414937
|
| Bibliographies/Indexes
|
:
|
Includes bibliographical references (pages 233-259) and index.
|
| Contents
|
:
|
Editor's introduction: Four centuries of Islamic thought in Chinese / Jonathan Lipman - Part I. The Qing Empire - A proper place for God: Ma Zhu's Chinese-Islamic cosmogenesis / Jonathan Lipman - Liu Zhi: the great integrator of Chinese Islamic thought / James D. Frankel - Tianfang Sanzijing: exchanges and changes in China's reception of Islamic law / Roberta Tontini - The multiple meanings of pilgrimage in Sino-lslamic thought / Kristian Petersen - Part II. Modern China - Ethnicity or religion? Republican-era Chinese debates on Islam and Muslims / Wlodzimierz Cieciura - Selective learning from the Middle East: the case of Sino-Muslim students at al-Azhar University / Yufeng Mao - Secularisation and modernisation of Islam in China: educational reform, Japanese occupation and the disappearance of Persian learning / Masumi Matsumoto - Between 'Abd al-Wahhab and Liu Zhi: Chinese Muslim intellectuals at the turn of the twenty-first century / Leila Chérif-Chebbi.
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
Tells the stories of Chinese Muslims trying to create coherent lives at the intersection of two potentially conflicting cultures. How can people belong simultaneously to two cultures, originating in two different places and expressed in two different languages, without alienating themselves from either? Muslims have lived in the Chinese culture area for 1400 years, and the intellectuals among them have long wrestled with this problem. Unlike Persian, Turkish, Urdu, or Malay, the Chinese language never adopted vocabulary from Arabic to enable a precise understanding of Islam's religious and philosophical foundations. Islam thus had to be translated into Chinese, which lacks words and arguments to justify monotheism, exclusivity, and other features of this Middle Eastern religion. Even in the 21st century, Muslims who are culturally Chinese must still justify their devotion to a single God, avoidance of pork, and their communities' distinctiveness, among other things, to sceptical non-Muslim neighbours and an increasingly intrusive state. The essays in this collection narrate the continuing translations and adaptations of Islam and Muslims in Chinese culture and society through the writings of Sino-Muslim intellectuals. Progressing chronologically and interlocking thematically, they help the reader develop a coherent understanding of the intellectual issues at stake. Key Features. Deals with the evolution of the Han kitab texts: their theology, genres, scope and bicultural simultaneity Explores how from the late 19th century Chinese Muslims developed complex and innovative intellectual relationships with Chinese nationalism and the processes that created a modern nation-state Shows how Sino-Muslims adapted to 20th-century modernity, including nationalism, liberalism and socialism
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Islam-- China-- History.
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Muslims-- China-- Intellectual life.
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Islam-- Chine-- Histoire.
|
| Subject
|
:
|
RELIGION-- Islam-- General.
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Islam.
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Muslims-- Intellectual life.
|
| Subject
|
:
|
China.
|
| Dewey Classification
|
:
|
951/.00882971
|
| LC Classification
|
:
|
BP63.C5I85 2016eb
|
| NLM classification
|
:
|
BE 8210rvk
|
| Added Entry
|
:
|
Lipman, Jonathan Neaman
|
| Parallel Title
|
:
|
Sino-Muslim intellectual evolution from the 17th to the 21st century
|
| |