|
" Governing Parties and Southern Internationalism : "
Moore, Candice Eleanor
| Document Type
|
:
|
Latin Dissertation
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
1098584
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
TLets547258
|
| Main Entry
|
:
|
Moore, Candice Eleanor
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
Governing Parties and Southern Internationalism :\ Moore, Candice Eleanor
|
| College
|
:
|
London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)
|
| Date
|
:
|
2011
|
| student score
|
:
|
2011
|
| Degree
|
:
|
Ph.D.
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
The international relations literature on internationalism in foreign policy has not taken account of the internationalist methods and motives of countries of the developing world. This thesis aims to correct this absence through an analysis of Southern internationalism, as evidenced by the foreign policy approaches of South Africa and Brazil in the first decade of the 21st century. By utilising a neoclassical realist approach to the study of the emergence of new powers, the use of internationalism as a foreign policy tool is interrogated as a response both to domestic imperatives, such as perception and identity, and systemic constraints and opportunities. Central to the analysis is an examination of the role of governing parties in foreign policymaking, both as key actors in determining policy, and as the sources of ideational constructs, in this case ‘internationalism’, that have a bearing on foreign policy. Foreign policymakers are limited in their perceptions and responses to external threats and opportunities by the domestic institutional structure, as well as by external threats and opportunities. In South Africa, responses are often limited to rhetoric, owing to limited resource extraction capacity, in spite of the highly centralised foreign policymaking structure under Mbeki. In Brazil, constitutional checks and balances also limited the state’s responses to external stimuli under Lula; yet, these responses, when they are implemented, can be more forceful owing to greater resource capacity. The ‘new Southern internationalism’, propounded by both South Africa and Brazil, is a function of domestic politics and external pressures, as evidenced by the Haiti case. These findings make a contribution to advancing the analysis of emerging powers, their trajectory and intentions in international relations, as well as the extent to which governing parties can influence foreign policy outcomes, and under which conditions
|
| Subject
|
:
|
HC Economic History and Conditions
|
|
|
:
|
JZ International relations
|
| Added Entry
|
:
|
London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)
|
| |