This page uses JavaScript and requires a JavaScript enabled browser.Your browser is not JavaScript enabled.
مرکز و کتابخانه مطالعات اسلامی به زبان های اروپایی
منو
درگاههای جستجو
مدارک
جستجوی پیشرفته
مرور
جستجو در سایر کتابخانه ها
مستندات
جستجوی پیشرفته
مرور
منابع دیجیتال
تمام متن
اصطلاحنامه
درختواره
پرسش و پاسخ
سوالات متداول
پرسش از کتابدار
پیگیری پرسش
ورود
ثبت نام
راهنما
خطا
رکورد قبلی
رکورد بعدی
"
The ritual of prayer: A spiritual occupation
"
Mohammad S. Nazzal
G. Hersch
Document Type
:
AL
Record Number
:
1078773
Doc. No
:
LA122402
Call No
:
10.1163/1568527991517969
Language of Document
:
English
Main Entry
:
Theodore Vial
Title & Author
:
Opposites Attract: [Article] : the Body and Cognition in a Debate over Baptism\ Theodore Vial
Publication Statement
:
Leiden: Brill
Title of Periodical
:
Numen
Date
:
1999
Volume/ Issue Number
:
46/2
Page No
:
121–145
Abstract
:
Analysis of a change in a historical rite of passage, the baptism ceremony in Zurich in the 1860s, shows the relative strengths and weaknesses of recent developments in the field of ritual studies. Those who argue that ritualized action is an embodied negotiation of power relations are helpful in understanding why various groups in society fought either for or against the ritual change. But the weak structural component of these theories and an inadequate model of human action make them unable to account for speech acts in ritual, or for the change in the Zurich ritual. Cognitive theories of ritual are far more successful in explaining the force of specific structural changes. Far from being incompatible, these different approaches to ritual, if based on an adequate model of human agency, are complementary and necessary for an adequate account of the historical ritual change examined. Analysis of a change in a historical rite of passage, the baptism ceremony in Zurich in the 1860s, shows the relative strengths and weaknesses of recent developments in the field of ritual studies. Those who argue that ritualized action is an embodied negotiation of power relations are helpful in understanding why various groups in society fought either for or against the ritual change. But the weak structural component of these theories and an inadequate model of human action make them unable to account for speech acts in ritual, or for the change in the Zurich ritual. Cognitive theories of ritual are far more successful in explaining the force of specific structural changes. Far from being incompatible, these different approaches to ritual, if based on an adequate model of human agency, are complementary and necessary for an adequate account of the historical ritual change examined.
Location & Call number
:
10.1163/1568527991517969
https://lib.clisel.com/site/catalogue/53325
کپی لینک
پیشنهاد خرید
پیوستها
عنوان :
نام فایل :
نوع عام محتوا :
نوع ماده :
فرمت :
سایز :
عرض :
طول :
3347076_10306.pdf
3347076.pdf
پایان نامه لاتین
متن
application/octet-stream
2.62 MB
85
85
نمایش
نظرسنجی
نظرسنجی منابع دیجیتال
1 - آیا از کیفیت منابع دیجیتال راضی هستید؟
X
کم
متوسط
زیاد
ذخیره
پاک کن