|
" Green screen : "
David Ingram.
| Document Type
|
:
|
BL
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
557261
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
b385981
|
| Main Entry
|
:
|
David Ingram
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
Green screen : : environmentalism and Hollywood cinema\ David Ingram.
|
| Edition Statement
|
:
|
1st
|
| Publication Statement
|
:
|
Exeter : University of Exeter Press,, 2015.
|
| ISBN
|
:
|
0859899195
|
|
|
:
|
: 9780859899192
|
| Notes
|
:
|
Previously issued in print: 2000.
|
| Contents
|
:
|
<P><p><BR>Contents: Introduction -- melodrama and environmental crisis. Part 1 Wilderness in Hollywood cinema: discourses of nature and environmentalism the cinematography of natural landscapes gender and the encounter with wilderness ecological Indians and the myth of primal purity gender, race and the politics of the Amazonian rain forests. Part 2 Wild animals in Hollywood cinema: endangered species and the North American anti-hunting narrative North American ocean mammals the wolf and the bear African animals from safari to conservation. Part 3 Development and the politics of land use: the country and the city automobile culture the risks of nuclear energy. Conclusion.</p><BR><P></p>
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
This book combines film studies with environmental history and politics, aiming to establish a cultural criticism informed by 'green' thought. David Ingram argues that Hollywood cinema has largely perpetuated romantic attitudes to nature and has played an important ideological role in the 'greenwashing' of ecological discourses.",,,,,"This book combines film studies with environmental history and politics, aiming to establish a cultural criticism informed by 'green' thought. David Ingram argues that Hollywood cinema has largelyThis book combines film studies with environmental history and politics, aiming to establish a cultural criticism informed by 'green' thought. David Ingram argues that Hollywood cinema has largelyThis book combines film studies with environmental history and politics, aiming to establish a cultural criticism informed by 'green' thought. David Ingram argues that Hollywood cinema has largely
|
| |