|
" The great endarkenment : "
Elijah Millgram
| Document Type
|
:
|
BL
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
653657
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
dltt
|
| Main Entry
|
:
|
Millgram, Elijah
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
The great endarkenment : : philosophy for an age of hyperspecialization /\ Elijah Millgram
|
| Page. NO
|
:
|
ix, 302 pages ;; 25 cm
|
| ISBN
|
:
|
9780199326020
|
|
|
:
|
: 0199326029
|
| Bibliographies/Indexes
|
:
|
Includes bibliographical references and index
|
| Contents
|
:
|
Introductory remarks on the Tower of Babel -- The great endarkenment -- Appendix a -- Appendix b -- Practical reasoning for serial hyperspecializers -- D'où venons-nous. . . que sommes nous. . .où allons-nous? -- Millian metaethics -- Why do we think there are things we ought to do? -- Lewis's epicycles, possible worlds, and the mysteries of modality -- Progressive necessity -- Applied ethics, moral skepticism and reasons with expiration dates -- Segmented agency -- Postscript
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
Human beings have always been specialists, but over the past two centuries division of labor has become deeper, ubiquitous, and much more fluid. The form it now takes brings in its wake a series of problems that are simultaneously philosophical and practical, having to do with coordinating the activities of experts in different disciplines who do not understand one another. Because these problems are unrecognized, and because we do not have solutions for them, we are on the verge of an age in which decisions that depend on understanding more than one discipline at a time whill be made badly. Since so many decisions do require multidisciplinary knowledge, these philosophical problems are urgent. Some of the puzzles that have traditionally been on philosophers' agendas have to do with intellectual devices developed to handle less extreme forms of specialization. Two of these, necessity and the practical "ought," are given extended treatment in Elijah Millgram's The Great Endarkenment. Millgram pays special attention to the ways in which a focus on cognitive function reframes familiar debates in metaethics and metaphysics. Consequences of hyperspecialization for the theory of practical rationality, for our conception of agency, and for ethics are laid out and discussed. An afterword considers whether and how philosophers can contribute to solving the very pressing problems created by contemporary division of labor. -- from dust jacket
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Philosophy, Modern-- 21st century-- Methodology
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Specialism (Philosophy)
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Analysis (Philosophy)
|
| |