| Document Type
|
:
|
BL
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
725257
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
b544976
|
| Main Entry
|
:
|
Aulis Aarnio.
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
The rational as reasonalble : : a treatise on legal justification\ Aulis Aarnio.
|
| Publication Statement
|
:
|
Dordrecht [etc.]: D. Reidel Publishing Company, [post, 2006], cop. 1987.
|
| Series Statement
|
:
|
Law and Philosophy Library.
|
| Page. NO
|
:
|
XIX, [1], 276 s. : il. ; 24 cm.
|
| ISBN
|
:
|
9400947003
|
|
|
:
|
: 9401085900
|
|
|
:
|
: 9789400947009
|
|
|
:
|
: 9789401085908
|
| Notes
|
:
|
Data wyd. na podst. 13-cyfrowego ISBN, w książce data cop. 1987.
|
| Contents
|
:
|
I: Introduction.- 1. The Point of Departure.- 1.1. The Routine Cases and the Hard Cases.- 1.2. The Dilemma of the Decision-Maker.- 1.3. On the Responsibility to Justify the Decisions.- 1.4. Legalism Contra Anti-Legalism.- 2. A Scientific Approach to the Contents of Legal Norms.- 2.1. The Scholar and the Judge.- 2.2. Legal Dogmatics and Social Sciences.- 2.3. Legal Dogmatics and Legal Practice.- 2.3.1. Normal Legal Practice.- 2.3.2. Judicial Practice.- 3. The Concept of Legal Dogmatics - A More Precise Formulation.- 4. The Angle of Approach and the Basic Problems.- II: The Ontology of Law.- 1. General Remarks.- 2. The Ontology of Interpretation in Legal Dogmatics.- 3. The Validity of a Legal Norm.- 3.1. Wroblewski's Three Approaches.- 3.2. Systematic Validity.- 3.3. The Efficacy of Legal Norms.- 3.4. The Acceptability of a Legal Norm.- III: The Methodology of Interpretation in Legal Dogmatics.- 1. Basic Concepts.- 1.1. Two Research Strategies.- 1.2. A Norm Statement and an Interpretative Statement.- 1.2.1. The Concept of the Norm Statement.- 1.2.2. Conclusion.- 1.2.3. A Meaning Statement and an Interpretation Statement.- 1.2.4. A Norm Standpoint and an Interpretation Standpoint.- 1.2.5. Summary.- 1.3. The Concept of the Norm.- 2. A General Characterization of Interpretation and Interpretation Theory.- 2.1. Interpretation as a Hermeneutic Process.- 2.2. The Special Nature of Interpretation in Legal Dogmatics.- 3. The Sources of Law and the Directives of Legal Interpretation.- 3.1. On the Concept of the Sources of Law.- 3.1.1. The Source of Information.- 3.1.2. The Source of Reasoning.- 3.2. The List of the Sources of Law.- 3.2.1. The Finnish Catalogue of the Sources.- 3.2.2. General Remarks.- 3.3. The Categorization of the Sources of Law.- 3.3.1. The Bindingness of the Sources of Law.- 3.3.2. Authoritative Reasons and Substantial Reasons.- 3.4. Directives of Legal Interpretation.- 3.4.1. The Order of Preference of the Sources of Law.- 3.4.2. The Standards of the Reasoning Procedure.- 4. Justification of the Interpretative Standpoint: Structural Analysis.- 4.1. The Point of Departure: Disagreement on the Result of the Interpretation.- 4.2. The Scope for Interpretation: Gaps and Conflicts in the Legal Order.- 4.3. The Procedure of Discourse.- 4.4. Internal and External Justification.- 4.5. The Structure of the Ex-Justification Procedure.- 4.6. An Example of the Justification Procedure.- 4.6.1. Travaux Preparatoires.- 4.6.2. Systemic Interpretation.- 4.6.3. Court Decisions as Reasons.- 4.6.4. On the Doctrinal Opinion.- 4.6.5. Practical Reasons.- 4.6.6. Summary.- 4.7. The Relation Between the Systematization and the Interpretation of Legal Norms.- 4.7.1. The Concept of Systematization.- 4.7.2. An Example of Systematization: An Analysis of the Position of the Heir.- IV: The Acceptability of an Interpretative Statement.- 1. The Principle of the One Right Answer.- 1.1. A Terminological Clarification.- 1.2. Examples of the Doctrines of the One Right Answer.- 1.2.1. Ronald Dworkin's Theory.- 1.2.2. Norm Statements as Norm Propositions.- 1.2.2.1. Norm Statements as Predictions.- 1.2.2.1.1. The Specific Nature of Legal Predictions.- 1.2.2.1.2. On the Alf Ross' Predictive Theory.- 1.2.2.2. Ilkka Niiniluoto's Approach.- 1.2.2.3. Norm Propositions as Technical Norms.- 1.2.2.3.1 General Remarks.- 1.2.2.3.2 Secondary Technical Norms.- 1.2.2.3.3 Primary Technical Norms.- 2. Acceptability and Rationality.- 2.1. The General Preconditions of the Justification of an Interpretative Standpoint.- 2.2 The Concept of Rational Acceptability.- 2.3 Why Be Rational?.- 2.4 The General Conditions of Rational Discourse.- 2.4.1 The Point of Departure.- 2.4.2 The Basic Principles and Rules of D-Rationality.- 2.4.2.1. Consistency-Rules.- 2.4.2.2. Efficiency-Rules.- 2.4.2.3. Sincerity-Rules.- 2.4.2.4. Generalization-Rules.- 2.4.2.5. Support-Rules.- 2.4.3. The Rules of the Burden of Proof.- 2.4.3.1. Procedural Rules of the Burden of Proof.- 2.4.3.2. Material Rules of the Burden of Proof.- 2.4.4 Summary.- 2.5. Interpretations and Evaluations.- 2.6. Knowledge, Certainty and Form of Life.- 2.7. The Audience and the Form of Life.- 2.7.1. Perelman's Theory of the Audience.- 2.7.2. Some Clarifications.- 2.7.2.1. The Concrete Audience.- 2.7.2.2. The Ideal Audience.- 2.7.3. Rational Acceptability as a Regulative Principle for Legal Dogmatics.- Epilogue.- Notes.- Abbreviations.
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Prawo -- interpretacja.
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Prawo -- metodologia.
|
| LC Classification
|
:
|
K290.A955 9999
|
| Added Entry
|
:
|
Aulis Aarnio
|
|
|
:
|
D. Reidel Publishing Company.
|
| Parallel Title
|
:
|
Rational as reasonable;Treatise on legal justification
|