|
" Conscience: "
edited by Gerhard Zecha, Paul Weingartner.
Document Type
|
:
|
BL
|
Record Number
|
:
|
773211
|
Doc. No
|
:
|
b593205
|
Main Entry
|
:
|
edited by Gerhard Zecha, Paul Weingartner.
|
Title & Author
|
:
|
Conscience: : An Interdisciplinary View : Salzburg Colloquium on Ethics in the Sciences and Humanities\ edited by Gerhard Zecha, Paul Weingartner.
|
Publication Statement
|
:
|
Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1987
|
Series Statement
|
:
|
Theory and decision library., Series A,, Philosophy and methodology of the social sciences ;, 1.
|
Page. NO
|
:
|
(XV, 304 pages).
|
ISBN
|
:
|
9400938217
|
|
:
|
: 9789400938212
|
Contents
|
:
|
1 / Conscience: Foundational Aspects --; Conscience as Principled Responsibility: On the Philosophy of Stage Six --; Discussion --; The Phenomenon of Conscience: Subject-Orientation and Object-Orientation --; Discussion --; 2 / Conscience: Social and Educational Aspects --; Value-Neutrality, Conscience, and the Social Sciences --; Discussion --; Moral Competence and Education in Democratic Society --; Discussion --; The Idea of Conscience in High School Students. Development of Judgments of Responsibility in Democratic Just Community Programs --; Discussion --; 3 / Conscience: Special Topics --; Conscience in Conflict? --; Discussion --; Aquinas' Theory of Conscience from a Logical Point of View --; Discussion --; The Ambivalent Relationship of Law and Freedom of Conscience: Intensification and Relaxation of Conscience Through the Legal System --; Discussion --; Psychoanalysis and Ethics --; Discussion --; Index of Names --; Index of Subjects.
|
Abstract
|
:
|
Value change and uncertainty about the validity of traditional moral convictions are frequently observed when scientific re search confronts us with new moral problems or challenges the moral responsibility of the scientist. Which ethics is to be relied on? Which principles are the most reasonable, the most humane ones? For want of an appropriate answer, moral authorities of ten point to conscience, the individual conscience, which seems to be man's unique, directly accessible and final source of moral contention. But what is meant by 'conscience'? There is hardly a notion as widely used and at the same time as controversial as that of conscience. In the history of ethics we can distinguish several trends in the interpretation of the concept and function of conscience. The Greeks used the word O"uvEt81lm~ to denote a kind of 'accompa nying knowledge' that mostly referred to negatively experienced behavior. In Latin, the expression conscientia meant a knowing together pointing beyond the individual consciousness to the common knowledge of other people. In the Bible, especially in the New Testament, O"uvEt81l0"t~ is used for the guiding con sciousness of the morality of one's own action.
|
Subject
|
:
|
Ethics.
|
Subject
|
:
|
Philosophy (General)
|
Subject
|
:
|
Philosophy of law.
|
LC Classification
|
:
|
B63.E358 1987
|
Added Entry
|
:
|
Gerhard Zecha
|
|
:
|
Paul Weingartner
|
Parallel Title
|
:
|
Interdisciplinary View; Theory and Decision Library, vol. 1; Conscience
|
| |