|
" Argumentation theory : "
Frans H. van Eemeren.
| Document Type
|
:
|
BL
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
810153
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
GBB918101b624169
|
| Main Entry
|
:
|
Eemeren, F. H. van, (Frans Hendrik),1946-
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
Argumentation theory : : a pragma-dialectical perspective /\ Frans H. van Eemeren.
|
| Series Statement
|
:
|
Argumentation library ;; volume 33
|
| Page. NO
|
:
|
1 online resource
|
| ISBN
|
:
|
9783319953816
|
|
|
:
|
: 3319953818
|
|
|
:
|
331995380X
|
|
|
:
|
9783319953809
|
| Contents
|
:
|
Chapter 1. Argumentation theory as a discipline -- Chapter 2. Building a theory of argumentation -- Chapter 3. A model of a critical discussion -- Chapter 4. Critical discussion and the identification of fallacies -- Chapter 5. Descriptive studies of argumentative discourse -- Chapter 6. Analysis as resolution-oriented reconstruction -- Chapter 7. Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse -- Chapter 8. Distinguishing between different kinds of argumentative practices -- Chapter 9. Prototypical argumentative patterns -- Chapter 10. Pragma-dialectics amidst other approaches to argumentation.
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argumentation theory. In presenting this overview, argumentation is consistently approached from a pragma-dialectical perspective by viewing it pragmatically as a goal-directed communicative activity and dialectically as part of a regulated critical exchange aimed at resolving a difference of opinion. As a result, the book also systematically explains how the constitutive parts of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, which are discussed in a number of separate publications, hang together. The following crucial topics are discussed: (1) argumentation theory as a discipline; (2) the meta-theoretical principles of pragma-dialectics; (3) the model of a critical discussion aimed at resolving a difference of opinion; (4) fallacies as violations of a code of conduct for reasonable argumentative discourse; (5) descriptive research of argumentative reality; (6) analysis as theoretically-motivated reconstruction; (7) strategic manoeuvring aimed at combining achieving effectiveness with maintaining reasonableness; (8) the conventionalization of argumentative practices; (9) prototypical argumentative patterns; (10) pragma-dialectics amidst other approaches.
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Persuasion (Rhetoric)
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Persuasion (Rhetoric)
|
| Dewey Classification
|
:
|
808
|
| LC Classification
|
:
|
P301.5.P47E36 2018
|
| |