رکورد قبلیرکورد بعدی

" ʿAṭṭār’s Taḏkirat al-awliyāʾ and Jāmī’s Nafaḥāt al-uns: Two Visions of Sainthood "


Document Type : AL
Record Number : 838294
Doc. No : LA106443
Call No : ‭10.116322138617-12340106.pdfdf‬
: ‭https://doi.org/10.1163/22138617-12340106‬
Main Entry : Denise Aigle
Title & Author : ʿAṭṭār’s Taḏkirat al-awliyāʾ and Jāmī’s Nafaḥāt al-uns: Two Visions of Sainthood [Article]\ Denise Aigle
Volume/ Issue Number : Volume 96: Issue 2
Page No : 271–315
Date : 18-Nov-16
Abstract : <p>This article presents two famous collections of the lives of saints: ʿAṭṭār’s <em>Taḏkirat al-awliyāʾ</em> and Jāmī’s <em>Nafaḥāt al-uns</em>. Every collection of the lives of saints shares the common tradition of Arabic-language works. Indeed, Hujvīrī’s <em>Kašf al-maḥjūb</em> and Anṣārī’s <em>Ṭabaqāt al-ṣūfiyyah</em> ensured the transition with Sufi literature written in Arabic. However, the <em>Taḏkirat al-awliyāʾ</em> is the first truly original work in Persian. ʿAṭṭār and Jāmī sought to make known to their respective communities of belief the words and deeds of spiritual masters, but they did so in two different ways. ʿAṭṭār chose a limited corpus of saints that, in his eyes, represented the primary movements of the first centuries of Sufism. Jāmī instead favoured exhaustiveness, amassing a great number of biographies, especially on the shaykhs of the Naqshbandi order. While Jāmī conveyed the paths of saintliness in accordance with the religious orthodoxy of his order, ʿAṭṭār showed a special attachment to the ecstatic masters. The <em>Taḏkirat al-awliyāʾ</em> and <em>Nafaḥāt al-uns</em> thus represent two different ways of commemorating the memory of the spiritual masters who embodied the mystical thought of Islam.</p>
Subject : ʿAṭṭār; Jāmī; Sanāʾī; Rūmī; Anṣārī; Hujvīrī; Abū Yazīd Bisṭāmī; Ḥallāj; Ǧaʿfar Ṣādiq; Šaṭḥ; Miʿrāǧ
Location & Call number : ‭10.116322138617-12340106.pdfdf‬
: ‭https://doi.org/10.1163/22138617-12340106‬
کپی لینک

پیشنهاد خرید
پیوستها
Search result is zero
نظرسنجی
نظرسنجی منابع دیجیتال

1 - آیا از کیفیت منابع دیجیتال راضی هستید؟