| Document Type
|
:
|
BL
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
878099
|
| Main Entry
|
:
|
Sattar, Adnan
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
Criminal punishment and human rights : : convenient morality /\ Adnan Sattar.
|
| Publication Statement
|
:
|
Abingdon, Oxon ;New York, NY :: Routledge,, 2019.
|
|
|
:
|
, ©2019
|
| Series Statement
|
:
|
Routledge research in human rights law
|
| Page. NO
|
:
|
1 online resource (xv, 269 pages).
|
| ISBN
|
:
|
0429459696
|
|
|
:
|
: 042986146X
|
|
|
:
|
: 0429861478
|
|
|
:
|
: 0429861486
|
|
|
:
|
: 9780429459696
|
|
|
:
|
: 9780429861468
|
|
|
:
|
: 9780429861475
|
|
|
:
|
: 9780429861482
|
|
|
:
|
9781138625792
|
| Bibliographies/Indexes
|
:
|
Includes bibliographical references and index.
|
| Contents
|
:
|
<P>Acknowledgements; Table of Conventions, Treaties and International Instruments; Table of National Legislation; Table of Cases; Introduction; 1. The Crime of Punishment: Reassessing Classical Penal Theory; 2. The Gods that Failed: Positivist Criminology and the Legacy of the International Penal and Penitentiary Commission; 3. Retributivism in the Age of Human Rights; 4. Punishment and the Origins of International Human Rights Law: An Uncensored Account; 5. The Untold Story of the Howard League's Campaign for an International Prisoners' Convention; 6. The Great Force of History: Development of the Global Human Rights Regime; 7. The Evolution and Interpretation of Human Rights Norms and Penal Aims: A New Standard of Civilization?; Conclusion; Bibliography </P>
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
This book examines the relationship between international human rights discourse and the justifi cations for criminal punishment. Using interdisciplinary discourse analysis, it exposes certain paradoxes that underpin the 'International Bill of Human Rights', academic commentaries on human rights law, and the global human rights monitoring regime in relation to the aims of punishment in domestic penal systems. It argues that human rights discourse, owing to its theoretical kinship with Kantian philosophy, embodies a paradoxical commitment to human dignity on the one hand, and retributive punishment on the other. Further, it sustains the split between criminal justice and social justice, which results in a sociologically ill-informed understanding of punishment. Human rights discourse plays a paradoxical role vis-aa-vis the punitive power of the state as it seeks to counter criminalisation in some areas and backs the introduction of new criminal offences - and longer prison sentences - in others. The underlying priorities, it is argued, have been shaped by a number of historical circumstances. Drawing on archival material, the study demonstrates that the international penal discourse produced during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century laid greater emphasis on offender rehabilitation and was more attentive to the social context of crime than is the case with the modern human rights discourse.
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Criminal law-- Philosophy.
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Human rights.
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Punishment-- Moral and ethical aspects.
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Punishment.
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Criminal law-- Philosophy.
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Human rights.
|
| Subject
|
:
|
LAW / Civil Rights
|
| Subject
|
:
|
LAW / Criminal Law / General
|
| Subject
|
:
|
LAW / General
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Punishment-- Moral and ethical aspects.
|
| Subject
|
:
|
Punishment.
|
| Dewey Classification
|
:
|
345/.077
|
| LC Classification
|
:
|
K5103.S28 2019
|