|
" An international parentage and identification panel for the domestic cat (Felis catus). "
Lipinski, MJ; Amigues, Y; Blasi, M; Broad, TE; Cherbonnel, C; Cho, GJ; Corley, S; Daftari, P; Delattre, DR; Dileanis, S; Flynn, JM; Grattapaglia, D; Guthrie, A; Harper, C; Karttunen, PL; Kimura, H; Lewis, GM; Longeri, M; Meriaux, J-C; Morita, M; Morrin-O'donnell, RC; Niini, T; et al.
| Document Type
|
:
|
AL
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
907515
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
LA7c92k1f3
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
An international parentage and identification panel for the domestic cat (Felis catus). [Article]\ Lipinski, MJ; Amigues, Y; Blasi, M; Broad, TE; Cherbonnel, C; Cho, GJ; Corley, S; Daftari, P; Delattre, DR; Dileanis, S; Flynn, JM; Grattapaglia, D; Guthrie, A; Harper, C; Karttunen, PL; Kimura, H; Lewis, GM; Longeri, M; Meriaux, J-C; Morita, M; Morrin-O'donnell, RC; Niini, T; et al.
|
| Date
|
:
|
2007
|
| Title of Periodical
|
:
|
UC Davis
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
Seventeen commercial and research laboratories participated in two comparison tests under the auspices of the International Society for Animal Genetics to develop an internationally tested, microsatellite-based parentage and identification panel for the domestic cat (Felis catus). Genetic marker selection was based on the polymorphism information content and allele ranges from seven random-bred populations (n = 261) from the USA, Europe and Brazil and eight breeds (n = 200) from the USA. Nineteen microsatellite markers were included in the comparison test and genotyped across the samples. Based on robustness and efficiency, nine autosomal microsatellite markers were ultimately selected as a single multiplex 'core' panel for cat identification and parentage testing. Most markers contained dinucleotide repeats. In addition to the autosomal markers, the panel included two gender-specific markers, amelogenin and zinc-finger XY, which produced genotypes for both the X and Y chromosomes. This international cat parentage and identification panel has a power of exclusion comparable to panels used in other species, ranging from 90.08% to 99.79% across breeds and 99.47% to 99.87% in random-bred cat populations.
|
| |