|
" Using abstract language signals power. "
Wakslak, Cheryl J; Smith, Pamela K; Han, Albert
| Document Type
|
:
|
AL
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
909124
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
LA9z12n3fg
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
Using abstract language signals power. [Article]\ Wakslak, Cheryl J; Smith, Pamela K; Han, Albert
|
| Date
|
:
|
2014
|
| Title of Periodical
|
:
|
UC San Diego
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
Power can be gained through appearances: People who exhibit behavioral signals of power are often treated in a way that allows them to actually achieve such power (Ridgeway, Berger, & Smith, 1985; Smith & Galinsky, 2010). In the current article, we examine power signals within interpersonal communication, exploring whether use of concrete versus abstract language is seen as a signal of power. Because power activates abstraction (e.g., Smith & Trope, 2006), perceivers may expect higher power individuals to speak more abstractly and therefore will infer that speakers who use more abstract language have a higher degree of power. Across a variety of contexts and conversational subjects in 7 experiments, participants perceived respondents as more powerful when they used more abstract language (vs. more concrete language). Abstract language use appears to affect perceived power because it seems to reflect both a willingness to judge and a general style of abstract thinking.
|
| |