|
" Wildlife Response to Riparian Restoration on the Sacramento River "
Golet, Gregory H; Gardali, Thomas; Howell, Christine A.; Hunt, John; Luster, Ryan A.; Rainey, William; Roberts, Michael D.; Silveira, Joseph; Swagerty, Helen; Williams, Neal; <a href="" class="c-authorlist__list-more-link">et al.</a>
| Document Type
|
:
|
AL
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
926547
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
LA4z17h9qm
|
| Language of Document
|
:
|
English
|
| Main Entry
|
:
|
Golet, Gregory H; Gardali, Thomas; Howell, Christine A.; Hunt, John; Luster, Ryan A.; Rainey, William; Roberts, Michael D.; Silveira, Joseph; Swagerty, Helen; Williams, Neal; lt;a href="" class="c-authorlist__list-more-link"gt;et al.lt;/agt;
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
Wildlife Response to Riparian Restoration on the Sacramento River [Article]\ Golet, Gregory H; Gardali, Thomas; Howell, Christine A.; Hunt, John; Luster, Ryan A.; Rainey, William; Roberts, Michael D.; Silveira, Joseph; Swagerty, Helen; Williams, Neal; a hrefet al./a
|
| Title of Periodical
|
:
|
San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science
|
| Volume/ Issue Number
|
:
|
6/2
|
| Date
|
:
|
2008
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
Studies that assess the success of riparian restoration projects seldom focus on wildlife. More generally, vegetation characteristics are studied, with the assumption that animal populations will recover once adequate habitats are established. On the Sacramento River, millions of dollars have been spent on habitat restoration, yet few studies of wildlife response have been published. Here we present the major findings of a suite of studies that assessed responses of four taxonomic groups (insects, birds, bats, and rodents). Study designs fell primarily into two broad categories: comparisons of restoration sites of different ages, and comparisons of restoration sites with agricultural and remnant riparian sites.
|
| |