Agreeing to Disagree: A Three Dimensional Framework for Planning Without Consensus

منو

" Agreeing to Disagree: A Three Dimensional Framework for Planning Without Consensus "
Christensen, Karen; Drury, David

Document Type	:	AL
Record Number	:	928499
Doc. No	:	LA4sr929dn
Language of Document	:	English
Main Entry	:	Christensen, Karen; Drury, David
Title & Author	:	Agreeing to Disagree: A Three Dimensional Framework for Planning Without Consensus [Article]\ Christensen, Karen; Drury, David
Title of Periodical	:	Berkeley Planning Journal
Volume/ Issue Number	:	1/1
Date	:	1984
Abstract	:	This essay proposes a structure and process for doing city master planning where there is no consensus on goals. It evolved from an attempt to help the city of Berkeley prepare to revise its Master Plan. Accordingly, our recommendations take into account Berkeley's unusually convoluted and polarized political situation, while affirming that the city's diversity is its richness. The proposal is meant to help Berkeley renew its tradition of innovative, respon sive planning. In doing so, the proposal presents a general scheme for helping cities when traditional approaches break down in discord. Key assets of the approach include flexibility, variability, and the capacity to accommodate diversity.