|
" Efficacy of Laryngeal Tube versus Bag Mask Ventilation by Inexperienced Providers "
Hart, Danielle; Driver, Brian; Kartha, Gautham; Reardon, Robert; Miner, James
| Document Type
|
:
|
AL
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
932647
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
LA8cp7f85r
|
| Language of Document
|
:
|
English
|
| Main Entry
|
:
|
Hart, Danielle; Driver, Brian; Kartha, Gautham; Reardon, Robert; Miner, James
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
Efficacy of Laryngeal Tube versus Bag Mask Ventilation by Inexperienced Providers [Article]\ Hart, Danielle; Driver, Brian; Kartha, Gautham; Reardon, Robert; Miner, James
|
| Title of Periodical
|
:
|
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health
|
| Volume/ Issue Number
|
:
|
21/3
|
| Date
|
:
|
2020
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
Introduction: Bag mask ventilation (BMV) and extraglottic devices (EGDs) are two common methods of providing rescue ventilation. BMV can be difficult to perform effectively, especially for inexperienced providers and in patients with difficult airway characteristics. There is some evidence that the laryngeal tube (LT) can be successfully placed by inexperienced providers to provide effective ventilation. However, it is unclear whether ventilation provided by LT is superior to that of BMV, especially in the hands of inexperienced airway providers. Therefore, we aimed to compare ventilation efficacy of inexperienced airway providers with BMV versus LT by primarily measuring tidal volumes and secondarily measuring peak pressures on a simulated model.
|
| |