|
" Do End-of-Rotation and End-of-Shift Assessments Inform Clinical Competency Committees’ (CCC) Decisions? "
Regan, Linda; Cope, Leslie; Omron, Rodney; Bright, Leah; Bayram, Jamil D.
| Document Type
|
:
|
AL
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
933052
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
LA2q747022
|
| Language of Document
|
:
|
English
|
| Main Entry
|
:
|
Regan, Linda; Cope, Leslie; Omron, Rodney; Bright, Leah; Bayram, Jamil D.
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
Do End-of-Rotation and End-of-Shift Assessments Inform Clinical Competency Committees’ (CCC) Decisions? [Article]\ Regan, Linda; Cope, Leslie; Omron, Rodney; Bright, Leah; Bayram, Jamil D.
|
| Title of Periodical
|
:
|
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health
|
| Volume/ Issue Number
|
:
|
19/1
|
| Date
|
:
|
2018
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
Introduction: Clinical Competency Committees (CCC) require reliable, objective data to inform decisions regarding assignment of milestone proficiency levels, which must be reported to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. After the development of two new assessment methods, the end-of-shift (EOS) assessment and the end-of-rotation (EOR) assessment, we sought to evaluate their performance. We report data on the concordance between these assessments, as well as how each informs the final proficiency level determined in biannual CCC meetings. We hypothesized that there would be a high concordance level between the two assessment methods, including concordance of both the EOS and EOR with the final proficiency level designation by the CCC.
|
| |