|
" Direct Observation Assessment of Milestones: Problems with Reliability "
Schott, Meghan; Kedia, Raashee; Promes, Susan B.; Swoboda, Thomas; O'Rourke, Kevin; Green, Walter; Liu, Rachel; Stansfield, Brent; Santen, Sally A.
| Document Type
|
:
|
AL
|
| Record Number
|
:
|
933472
|
| Doc. No
|
:
|
LA5qv670gp
|
| Language of Document
|
:
|
English
|
| Main Entry
|
:
|
Schott, Meghan; Kedia, Raashee; Promes, Susan B.; Swoboda, Thomas; O'Rourke, Kevin; Green, Walter; Liu, Rachel; Stansfield, Brent; Santen, Sally A.
|
| Title & Author
|
:
|
Direct Observation Assessment of Milestones: Problems with Reliability [Article]\ Schott, Meghan; Kedia, Raashee; Promes, Susan B.; Swoboda, Thomas; O'Rourke, Kevin; Green, Walter; Liu, Rachel; Stansfield, Brent; Santen, Sally A.
|
| Title of Periodical
|
:
|
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health
|
| Volume/ Issue Number
|
:
|
16/6
|
| Date
|
:
|
2015
|
| Abstract
|
:
|
Introduction: Emergency medicine (EM) milestones are used to assess residents’ progress. While some milestone validity evidence exists, there is a lack of standardized tools available to reliably assess residents. Inherent to this is a concern that we may not be truly measuring what we intend to assess. The purpose of this study was to design a direct observation milestone assessment instrument supported by validity and reliability evidence. In addition, such a tool would further lend validity evidence to the EM milestones by demonstrating their accurate measurement.
|
| |