|
" Does Personality Similarity in Bottlenose Dolphin Pairs Influence Dyadic Bond Characteristics? "
Moreno, Kelsey R; Highfill, Lauren; Kuczaj II, Stan A
Document Type
|
:
|
AL
|
Record Number
|
:
|
936077
|
Doc. No
|
:
|
LA1b38j9s2
|
Language of Document
|
:
|
English
|
Main Entry
|
:
|
Moreno, Kelsey R; Highfill, Lauren; Kuczaj II, Stan A
|
Title & Author
|
:
|
Does Personality Similarity in Bottlenose Dolphin Pairs Influence Dyadic Bond Characteristics? [Article]\ Moreno, Kelsey R; Highfill, Lauren; Kuczaj II, Stan A
|
Title of Periodical
|
:
|
International Journal of Comparative Psychology
|
Volume/ Issue Number
|
:
|
30
|
Date
|
:
|
2017
|
Abstract
|
:
|
Social structures are critical to the success of many species and have repercussions on health, well-being, and adaptation, yet little is known about the factors which shape these structures aside from ecology and life history strategies. Dyadic bonds are the basis of all social structures; however, mechanisms for formations of specific bonds or patterns in which individuals form which types of bonds have yet to be demonstrated. There is a variety of evidence indicating personality may be a factor in shaping bonds, but this relationship has not been explored with respect to bond components and is yet to be demonstrated in dolphins. This study utilizes a captive population in a naturalistic environment to test for correlation between similarity within the dyad along each personality factor and the strength of the dyad’s bond characteristics. Personality was assessed using a Five Factor Model questionnaire. Dyadic bond strength and characteristic qualities were determined through an exploratory factor analysis to group behaviors recorded via underwater opportunistic focal-follow video. Discovered bond components differed from previous studies and were termed affiliative support, sociosexual, and conflict play. Individuals who differed in Extraversion and Neuroticism displayed greater levels of bonding. This study expands our understanding of the formation of bonds between individuals and the evolution of social structure. Furthermore, it better equips us for making informed environmental policy decisions and improving captive animal care.
|
| |